184. This is the most famous moment of the
sūtra:
Vimalakīrti’s moment of sīlence on the subject of
nonduality, i.e., the
ultimate. It is noteworthy, however, that
Vimalakīrti does talk a great deal about the
ultimate on many other occasions; his silence here is given its special impact by the series of profound statements preceding it, which culminate in the statement of
Mañjuśrī to the effect that silence is itself the best explanation of
nonduality. Hence all silence is not to be exaggeratedly taken as the profoundest teaching, but only such a silence in the special context of profound thought on the
ultimate. For example, the silences of the disciples in Chap. 3, as they became speechless when confronted by the eloquent criticism of
Vimalakīrti, are not taken to be profound; nor is the silence of
Śāriputra when questioned by the goddess in Chap. 8 accepted as anything extraordinary.
Candrakīrti, in his
Prasannapadā (p 57, I.7-8), has this to say in regard to the question as to whether the enlightened ones employ logical arguments or not: “Who can say if the
noble ones (employ logical arguments) or not? The
ultimate is inherent (even) in the ‘keeping silent of the
noble ones.’ What then would cause us to imagine whether they employ logical arguments or do not employ logical arguments?” It is important to note that equating the
ultimate with the “keeping silent of the
noble ones” in no way precludes the ultimacy of their speech. As the Goddess says to
Śāriputra (
6.20): “…do not point to
liberation by abandoning speech! Why? The holy
liberation is the equality of all things!” Thus, to imitate the
sūtra’s pattern of expression: “Silence” and “speech” are dualistic. Just as speech is ultimately meaningless, so silence exists only in contrast with speech. Penetration into the equality of silence and speech is the entrance. (see Lamotte, pp 317-318, n 43).
185. Those of the
bodhisattvas who are monks, or who maintain ascetic practices, are allowed to eat only before noon; otherwise they must wait until dawn of the next day.
186. According to K and X, he was seen rising in the air; but Tib. has it that his speed was invisibly swift.
187. As there is no
Disciple Vehicle, much less ordinary individuals, in that exalted universe (see
9.2), they do not even know what might be meant by “aspire to inferior ways.”
191. This paragraph is modified in style with the help of X.
193. Ānanda, as well as being “foremost of attendants” (see
n.88), was also styled by the
Buddha as the “foremost of the learned” (Skt.
bahuśrutānām agryaḥ) and as the “foremost of those endowed with memory and
retention” (Skt.
smṛtidhāraṇīprāptānām agryaḥ). Thus he was the one who remembered the vast body of the
sūtras and recited them from memory during the first collection of the
Sūtra Pitaka, after the
Buddha’s passing into final
liberation.
194. That is, destructible (Skt.
kṣaya) = compounded (Skt.
saṃskṛta) = the superficial (Skt.
saṃvṛtti) =
saṃsāra. Indestructible (
akṣaya) = uncompounded (Skt.
asaṁskṛta) = the
ultimate (Skt.
paramārtha) = nirvāṇa.
196. Immoral persons, along with other living beings who suffer their immoral acts, provide the
bodhisattva the opportunity to expiate through suffering any traces of bad
karma, as well as to practice generosity, tolerance, etc., and eventually to gather into the discipline those same immoral persons.
197. Skt.
apratihatapratibhāṇa. This is another synonym for buddhahood because only at that stage does the turning of the Wheel of
Dharma become automatic, effortless, and irresistible.
199. The sixth superknowledge (
āsravakṣayajñāna) is attained only by
arhats, of whom the
Buddha is foremost.
201. Tib.
chos kyi rtsi ba thams cad sgrub pa’i phyir ’dus ma byas la mi gnas so/ ’di tar chos chung ngu’i sman sbyor ba’i phyir ’dus byas zad par mi byed do. This sentence is absent in K and X.
202. Tib.
gzugs kyi de bzhin nyid kyi rang bzhin, Skt.
rūpatathatāsvabhāva, i.e., voidness, as “essence which is reality” is a euphemism for “essencelessness” (
niḥsvabhāvatā). Thus the
Tathāgata is the voidness of
matter, i.e.,
matter in the
ultimate sense, not mere relative
matter—and so on for the remaining four
aggregates. For interesting references on the
ultimate nonexistence of the
Tathāgata, see Lamotte, p 355, n 1. The reference given there is worth repeating here (from
Prasannapadā, p 435, quoting a
Vaipulyasūtra): “Those who see me by means of form, or who follow me by means of sound—they are involved with false and ruinous
views and will never see me at all. The
buddhas are to be seen by means of
ultimate reality, since those leaders are
Dharma-bodies, and
ultimate reality is impossible to know, as it is not an object of discernment.”
203. K and X: “He lives neither in any place, nor in no place.”
204. Tib.
smra ba dang spyod pa thams cad shin tu chad pa, but Skt. has
sarvarutavyāhārasamucchinnaḥ, “the destruction of all utterance and language.”
205. K and X have “worry.”
206. Skt.
acintyavikurvaṇanayapraveśanirdeśa. This is a description, not a title of the
sūtra, as it is not mentioned at the end of this chapter, where the
Buddha gives the titles to
Ānanda.
207. Skt.
Acintyavimokṣanirdeśa
208. These names of the
Buddha form part of a traditional litany consisting of eighty names. See
Mahāvyutpatti, nos. 1-80.
210. These are called the “
four reliances” and are usually given in a different order: see glossary.
212. According to this belief, in the blessed eon of one thousand
buddhas,
Śākyamuni is the fourth, and
Maitreya will be the fifth to incarnate in this
Sahā universe.
213. Skt.
Vimalakīrtinirdeśa.
214. Skt.
Yamakapuṭavyatyastanihāra.
215. Skt.
Acintyadharmavimokṣaparivarta. In regard to these titles, see Introduction,
i.9 and
i.122