Skip to reading

Not-self · SN 22.59

Early discourse · the five aggregates

The delicate veins of a fallen leaf on damp stone.
About this textContext & reading guide
Its setting
At the Deer Park near Bārāṇasī, the Buddha addresses the group of five monks.
Its place in the teaching
The five aggregates are examined in relation to control, change, suffering and identification.
Something to investigate
How does the text move from observations about experience to the question of regarding it as mine or myself?
Read alongside & investigate

Why read these together?

Try, observe, revisit

Notice one changing feeling or thought. Examine how much it follows your wishes and how identifying with it affects your response.

Return to the repeated questions about each aggregate. What work does the repetition do?

Translation note. Anattā is rendered not-self or non-self. Read its application to the aggregates before treating it as a free-standing slogan. Compare key terms →

About this reading

The Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta examines body, feeling, perception, mental formations and consciousness. These five aggregates are changeable and cannot be made to obey our wishes completely.

The teaching explores identification with experience as “mine” or “my self.” Its sequence moves from observing instability to disenchantment and release.

Context, connections and reflections are editorial guidance. Read the text below or compare the source translation →.

Not-self · SN 22.59

At one time the Buddha was staying near Varanasi in the deer park at Isipatana. There the Buddha addressed the group of five mendicants:

“Mendicants!”

“Venerable sir,” they replied. The Buddha said this:

“Mendicants, form is not-self. For if form were self, it wouldn’t lead to affliction. And you could compel form: ‘May my form be like this! May it not be like that!’ But because form is not-self, it leads to affliction. And you can’t compel form: ‘May my form be like this! May it not be like that!’

Feeling is not-self …

Perception is not-self …

Choices are not-self …

Consciousness is not-self. For if consciousness were self, it wouldn’t lead to affliction. And you could compel consciousness: ‘May my consciousness be like this! May it not be like that!’ But because consciousness is not-self, it leads to affliction. And you can’t compel consciousness: ‘May my consciousness be like this! May it not be like that!’

What do you think, mendicants? Is form permanent or impermanent?”

“Impermanent, sir.”

“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”

“Suffering, sir.”

“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”

“No, sir.”

“Is feeling permanent or impermanent?” …

“Is perception permanent or impermanent?” …

“Are choices permanent or impermanent?” …

“Is consciousness permanent or impermanent?”

“Impermanent, sir.”

“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”

“Suffering, sir.”

“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”

“No, sir.”

“So you should truly see any kind of form at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: all form—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’

Any kind of feeling at all …

Any kind of perception at all …

Any kind of choices at all …

You should truly see any kind of consciousness at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: all consciousness—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’

Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness. Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed.

They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”

That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, the group of five mendicants approved what the Buddha said. And while this discourse was being spoken, the minds of the group of five mendicants were freed from defilements by not grasping.

Translations & sourcesEditions & translators
Read at SuttaCentral ↗

Translated by Bhikkhu Sujato

Compare at Dhammatalks.org ↗

Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu titles this translation “Five Brethren.” It is also known as the Discourse on the Characteristic of Not-self.

Edition & attribution

Translated by Bhikkhu Sujato · CC0 1.0

Read at SuttaCentral ↗

SuttaCentral · Bilara translations · Bhikkhu Sujato · CC0 1.0

Introductions, reflection questions and added section headings are editorial material, separate from the attributed translation.

The opening image is AI-generated nature artwork created for Buddhist Atlas. It is an evocative companion, not a depiction of the text’s historical setting.

Source link checked October 1, 2026. The linked publisher provides the text and its usage terms.

Connections
Guru Viking0

No connected episodes found for this text.

People & teachers6
Traditions & history4
  • The Buddha & early community

    Early-community setting of this discourse.

    Source
  • Theravāda

    Study context: this text is included in the Atlas guide to Theravāda.

  • Insight

    Study context: this text is included in the Atlas guide to Insight.

  • Mahāsi

    Study context: this text is included in the Atlas guide to Mahāsi.

Books1
Topics3

Make yourself comfortable

Text size