“They will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact; and they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact.
“They will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact; and they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact.
“They will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact; and they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact.
“They will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is feelings arising from visually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is feelings arising from aurally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is feelings arising from nasally compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is feelings arising from lingually compounded sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is feelings arising from corporeally compounded sensory contact; and they will not falsely imagine that feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is feelings arising from mentally compounded sensory contact.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that the earth element is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the earth element; they will not falsely imagine that the water element is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the water element; they will not falsely imagine that the fire element is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the fire element; they will not falsely imagine that the wind element is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the wind element; they will not falsely imagine that the space element is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the space element; and they will not falsely imagine that the consciousness element is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the consciousness element.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that ignorance is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is ignorance; they will not falsely imagine that formative predispositions are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is formative predispositions; they will not falsely imagine that consciousness is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is consciousness; they will not falsely imagine that name and form are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is name and form; they will not falsely imagine that the six sense fields are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the six sense fields; they will not falsely imagine that sensory contact is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is sensory contact; they will not falsely imagine that sensation is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is sensation; they will not falsely imagine that craving is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is craving; they will not falsely imagine that grasping is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is grasping; they will not falsely imagine that the rebirth process is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the rebirth process; they will not falsely imagine that birth is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is birth; and they will not falsely imagine that aging and death are void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is aging and death.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is nonceasing, and they will not falsely imagine that nonceasing is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is at peace, and they will not falsely imagine that being at peace is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the perfection of generosity is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the perfection of generosity; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of ethical discipline is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the perfection of ethical discipline; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of tolerance is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the perfection of tolerance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of perseverance is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the perfection of perseverance; they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of meditative concentration is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the perfection of meditative concentration; and they will not falsely imagine that the perfection of wisdom is void, and they will not falsely imagine that voidness is the perfection of wisdom.
“They will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of internal phenomena is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external phenomena is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of external phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of external and internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of emptiness is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of emptiness; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of great extent is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of great extent; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of ultimate reality is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of ultimate reality; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of conditioned phenomena is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of conditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of the unlimited is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of the unlimited; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonexclusion is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of nonexclusion; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of inherent nature is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of inherent nature; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of all phenomena is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of all phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonentities is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of nonentities; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of essential nature is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of essential nature; and they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities is empty, and they will not falsely imagine that emptiness is the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities.
“They will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of internal phenomena is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external phenomena is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of external phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of external and internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of emptiness is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of emptiness; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of great extent is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of great extent; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of ultimate reality is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of ultimate reality; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of conditioned phenomena is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of conditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of the unlimited is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of the unlimited; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonexclusion is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of nonexclusion; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of inherent nature is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of inherent nature; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of all phenomena is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of all phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonentities is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of nonentities; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of essential nature is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of essential nature; and they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities is signless, and they will not falsely imagine that signlessness is the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities.
“They will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of internal phenomena is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external phenomena is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of external phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of external and internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of emptiness is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of emptiness; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of great extent is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of great extent; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of ultimate reality is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of ultimate reality; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of conditioned phenomena is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of conditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of the unlimited is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of the unlimited; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonexclusion is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of nonexclusion; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of inherent nature is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of inherent nature; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of all phenomena is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of all phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonentities is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of nonentities; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of essential nature is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of essential nature; and they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities is wishless, and they will not falsely imagine that wishlessness is the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities.
“They will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of internal phenomena is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external phenomena is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of external phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of external and internal phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of emptiness is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of emptiness; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of ultimate reality is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of ultimate reality; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of great extent is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of great extent; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of ultimate reality is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of ultimate reality; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of conditioned phenomena is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of conditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of the unlimited is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of the unlimited; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonexclusion is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of nonexclusion; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of inherent nature is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of inherent nature; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of all phenomena is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of all phenomena; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of nonentities is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of nonentities; they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of essential nature is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of essential nature; and they will not falsely imagine that the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities is nonarising, and they will not falsely imagine that nonarising is the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities.