“The utter purity of ignorance is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of ignorance, so this utter purity of ignorance and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of formative predispositions is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of formative predispositions, so this utter purity of formative predispositions and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of consciousness, so this utter purity of consciousness and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of name and form is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of name and form, so this utter purity of name and form and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the six sense fields is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the six sense fields, so this utter purity of the six sense fields and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of sensory contact, so this utter purity of sensory contact and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of sensation is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of sensation, so this utter purity of sensation and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of craving is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of craving, so this utter purity of craving and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of grasping is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of grasping, so this utter purity of grasping and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the rebirth process is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the rebirth process, so this utter purity of the rebirth process and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of birth is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of birth, so this utter purity of birth and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of aging and death is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of aging and death, so this utter purity of aging and death and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the perfection of generosity is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of generosity, so this utter purity of the perfection of generosity and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of ethical discipline is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of ethical discipline, so this utter purity of the perfection of ethical discipline and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of tolerance is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of tolerance, so this utter purity of the perfection of tolerance and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of perseverance is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of perseverance, so this utter purity of the perfection of perseverance and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of meditative concentration is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of meditative concentration, so this utter purity of the perfection of meditative concentration and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of wisdom is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of wisdom, so this utter purity of the perfection of wisdom and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of external phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of external phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of external phenomena and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of emptiness is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of emptiness, so this utter purity of the emptiness of emptiness and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of great extent is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of great extent, so this utter purity of the emptiness of great extent and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of ultimate reality is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of ultimate reality, so this utter purity of the emptiness of ultimate reality and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of conditioned phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of conditioned phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of conditioned phenomena and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of the unlimited is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of the unlimited, so this utter purity of the emptiness of the unlimited and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end, so this utter purity of the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of nonexclusion is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of nonexclusion, so this utter purity of the emptiness of nonexclusion and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of inherent nature is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of inherent nature, so this utter purity of the emptiness of inherent nature and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of all phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of all phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of all phenomena and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics, so this utter purity of the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended, so this utter purity of the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of nonentities is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of nonentities, so this utter purity of the emptiness of nonentities and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of essential nature is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of essential nature, so this utter purity of the emptiness of essential nature and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities, so this utter purity of the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the applications of mindfulness is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the applications of mindfulness, so this utter purity of the applications of mindfulness and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the correct exertions is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the correct exertions, so this utter purity of the correct exertions and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the supports for miraculous ability is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the supports for miraculous ability, so this utter purity of the supports for miraculous ability and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the faculties is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the faculties, so this utter purity of the faculties and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the powers is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the powers, so this utter purity of the powers and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the branches of enlightenment is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the branches of enlightenment, so this utter purity of the branches of enlightenment and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the noble eightfold path is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the noble eightfold path, so this utter purity of the noble eightfold path and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the truths of the noble ones is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the truths of the noble ones, so this utter purity of the truths of the noble ones and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the meditative concentrations is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the meditative concentrations, so this utter purity of the meditative concentrations and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the immeasurable attitudes is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the immeasurable attitudes, so this utter purity of the immeasurable attitudes and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the formless absorptions is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the formless absorptions, so this utter purity of the formless absorptions and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the eight liberations is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the eight liberations, so this utter purity of the eight liberations and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are not different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the nine serial steps of meditative absorption is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the nine serial steps of meditative absorption, so this utter purity of the nine serial steps of meditative absorption and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness gateways to liberation is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness gateways to liberation, so this utter purity of the emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness gateways to liberation and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the extrasensory powers is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the extrasensory powers, so this utter purity of the extrasensory powers and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the meditative stabilities is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the meditative stabilities, so this utter purity of the meditative stabilities and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the dhāraṇī gateways is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the dhāraṇī gateways, so this utter purity of the dhāraṇī gateways and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the powers of the tathāgatas is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the powers of the tathāgatas, so this utter purity of the powers of the tathāgatas and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the fearlessnesses is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the fearlessnesses, so this utter purity of the fearlessnesses and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the kinds of exact knowledge is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the kinds of exact knowledge, so this utter purity of the kinds of exact knowledge and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of great loving kindness is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of great loving kindness, so this utter purity of great loving kindness and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of great compassion is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of great compassion, so this utter purity of great compassion and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the eighteen distinct qualities of the buddhas is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the eighteen distinct qualities of the buddhas, so this utter purity of the eighteen distinct qualities of the buddhas and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of knowledge of all the dharmas is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity a knower is owing to knowledge of all the dharmas, so this utter purity of knowledge of all the dharmas and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the knowledge of the aspects of the path is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of the knowledge of the aspects of the path, so this utter purity of the knowledge of the aspects of the path and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of all-aspect omniscience is owing to the utter purity of a knower, and the utter purity of a knower is owing to the utter purity of all-aspect omniscience, so this utter purity of all-aspect omniscience and this utter purity of a knower are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“Moreover, Subhūti, the utter purity of physical forms is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of physical forms, so this utter purity of physical forms and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of feelings is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings, so this utter purity of feelings and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of perceptions is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of perceptions, so this utter purity of perceptions and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of formative predispositions is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of formative predispositions, so this utter purity of formative predispositions and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of consciousness, so this utter purity of consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the eyes is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the eyes, so this utter purity of the eyes and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the ears is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the ears, so this utter purity of the ears and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the nose is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the nose, so this utter purity of the nose and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the tongue is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the tongue, so this utter purity of the tongue and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the body is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the body, so this utter purity of the body and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the mental faculty is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the mental faculty, so this utter purity of the mental faculty and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of sights is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of sights, so this utter purity of sights and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of sounds is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of sounds, so this utter purity of sounds and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of odors is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of odors, so this utter purity of odors and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of tastes is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of tastes, so this utter purity of tastes and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of tangibles is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of tangibles, so this utter purity of tangibles and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of mental phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of mental phenomena, so this utter purity of mental phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of visual consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of visual consciousness, so this utter purity of visual consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of auditory consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of auditory consciousness, so this utter purity of auditory consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of olfactory consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of olfactory consciousness, so this utter purity of olfactory consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of gustatory consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of gustatory consciousness, so this utter purity of gustatory consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of tactile consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of tactile consciousness, so this utter purity of tactile consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of mental consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of mental consciousness, so this utter purity of mental consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of visually compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of visually compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of visually compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of aurally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of aurally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of aurally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of nasally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of nasally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of nasally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of lingually compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of lingually compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of lingually compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of corporeally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of corporeally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of corporeally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of mentally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of mentally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of mentally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of feelings conditioned by visually compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of feelings conditioned by aurally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings conditioned by aurally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of feelings conditioned by aurally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of feelings conditioned by nasally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings conditioned by nasally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of feelings conditioned by nasally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of feelings conditioned by lingually compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings conditioned by lingually compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of feelings conditioned by lingually compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of feelings conditioned by corporeally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings conditioned by corporeally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of feelings conditioned by corporeally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact, so this utter purity of feelings conditioned by mentally compounded sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the earth element is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the earth element, so this utter purity of the earth element and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the water element is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the water element, so this utter purity of the water element and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the fire element is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the fire element, so this utter purity of the fire element and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the wind element is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the wind element, so this utter purity of the wind element and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the space element is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the space element, so this utter purity of the space element and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the consciousness element is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the consciousness element, so this utter purity of the consciousness element and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of ignorance is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of ignorance, so this utter purity of ignorance and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of formative predispositions is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of formative predispositions, so this utter purity of formative predispositions and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of consciousness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of consciousness, so this utter purity of consciousness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of name and form is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of name and form, so this utter purity of name and form and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the six sense fields is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the six sense fields, so this utter purity of the six sense fields and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of sensory contact is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of sensory contact, so this utter purity of sensory contact and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of sensation is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of sensation, so this utter purity of sensation and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of craving is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of craving, so this utter purity of craving and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of grasping is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of grasping, so this utter purity of grasping and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the rebirth process is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the rebirth process, so this utter purity of the rebirth process and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of birth is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of birth, so this utter purity of birth and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of aging and death is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of aging and death, so this utter purity of aging and death and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the perfection of generosity is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of generosity, so this utter purity of the perfection of generosity and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of ethical discipline is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of ethical discipline, so this utter purity of the perfection of ethical discipline and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of tolerance is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of tolerance, so this utter purity of the perfection of tolerance and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of perseverance is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of perseverance, so this utter purity of the perfection of perseverance and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of meditative concentration is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of meditative concentration, so this utter purity of the perfection of meditative concentration and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the perfection of wisdom is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the perfection of wisdom, so this utter purity of the perfection of wisdom and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of internal phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of external phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of external phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of external phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of external and internal phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of emptiness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of emptiness, so this utter purity of the emptiness of emptiness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of great extent is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of great extent, so this utter purity of the emptiness of great extent and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of ultimate reality is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of ultimate reality, so this utter purity of the emptiness of ultimate reality and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of conditioned phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of conditioned phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of conditioned phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of unconditioned phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of the unlimited is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of the unlimited, so this utter purity of the emptiness of the unlimited and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end, so this utter purity of the emptiness of that which has neither beginning nor end and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of nonexclusion is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of nonexclusion, so this utter purity of the emptiness of nonexclusion and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of inherent nature is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of inherent nature, so this utter purity of the emptiness of inherent nature and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of all phenomena is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of all phenomena, so this utter purity of the emptiness of all phenomena and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics, so this utter purity of the emptiness of intrinsic defining characteristics and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended, so this utter purity of the emptiness of that which cannot be apprehended and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of nonentities is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of nonentities, so this utter purity of the emptiness of nonentities and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of essential nature is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of essential nature, so this utter purity of the emptiness of essential nature and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities, so this utter purity of the emptiness of an essential nature of nonentities and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.
“The utter purity of the applications of mindfulness is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the applications of mindfulness, so this utter purity of the applications of mindfulness and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the correct exertions is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the correct exertions, so this utter purity of the correct exertions and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the supports for miraculous ability is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the supports for miraculous ability, so this utter purity of the supports for miraculous ability and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the faculties is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the faculties, so this utter purity of the faculties and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the powers is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the powers, so this utter purity of the powers and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the branches of enlightenment is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the branches of enlightenment, so this utter purity of the branches of enlightenment and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct. The utter purity of the noble eightfold path is owing to the utter purity of a viewer, and the utter purity of a viewer is owing to the utter purity of the noble eightfold path, so this utter purity of the noble eightfold path and this utter purity of a viewer are not two, cannot be divided into two, are no different, and are not distinct.